If you have bought anything in the last decade, you have seen the sticker: "This product can expose you to chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer." It is on power cords, luggage, furniture, and mattresses. Most people have learned to read past it, which is a reasonable response to a label that shows up on almost everything. But the list behind that sticker is real, it is specific, and it names chemicals by CAS number. So we did the obvious thing nobody seems to publish: we lined up our atlas against it.
What a Prop 65 listing actually is
Proposition 65 is a 1986 California law, formally the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act. It requires the state to keep a published list of chemicals it considers capable of causing cancer or reproductive harm, and it requires businesses to warn before they knowingly expose people to those chemicals. The list has roughly 900 entries and is revised at least once a year. Regulatory — OEHHA
A chemical gets on the list through one of a few doors. Most often an authoritative scientific body has already classified it: the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the US National Toxicology Program, or the US EPA. Sometimes California's own qualified experts add it. Sometimes federal law already requires the chemical to be labeled, and the state adopts that. The important part for reading the list honestly is that a listing is a statement about the chemical's hazard, which is its capacity to cause harm at some dose. It is not a statement about the risk from any particular product, which depends on how much of the chemical actually reaches you.
The 89 listed compounds in the Atlas
Here is every compound we track that carries a Proposition 65 listing, sorted so the ones listed for both cancer and reproductive harm come first. Each name links to its atlas page, where the bedroom-relevant exposure and its evidence tier are covered in full. The year is when the listing took effect. Regulatory — OEHHA
| Compound | CAS | Listed for | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,3-Butadiene | 106-99-0 | Cancer Reproductive | 1988 |
| Acrylamide | 79-06-1 | Cancer Reproductive | 1990 |
| Arsenic | 7440-38-2 | Cancer Reproductive | 1987 |
| Benzene | 71-43-2 | Cancer Reproductive | 1987 |
| Cadmium | 7440-43-9 | Cancer Reproductive | 1987 |
| Carbaryl (Sevin) | 63-25-2 | Cancer Reproductive | 2009 |
| Chloroform | 67-66-3 | Cancer Reproductive | 1987 |
| Chromium | 7440-47-3 | Cancer Reproductive | 1987 |
| Cyclophosphamide | 50-18-0 | Cancer Reproductive | 1987 |
| DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) | 50-29-3 | Cancer Reproductive | 1987 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | 117-81-7 | Cancer Reproductive | 1988 |
| Dioxins & furans (2,3,7,8-TCDD) | 1746-01-6 | Cancer Reproductive | 1988 |
| Ethylene oxide | 75-21-8 | Cancer Reproductive | 1987 |
| Etoposide | 33419-42-0 | Cancer Reproductive | 1990 |
| Heptachlor | 76-44-8 | Cancer Reproductive | 1988 |
| Hexachlorobenzene | 118-74-1 | Cancer Reproductive | 1987 |
| Lead | 7439-92-1 | Cancer Reproductive | 1987 |
| Perfluorooctanoic acid | 335-67-1 | Cancer Reproductive | 2017 |
| Trichloroethylene (TCE) | 79-01-6 | Cancer Reproductive | 1988 |
| 1,4-Dichlorobenzene | 106-46-7 | Cancer | 1989 |
| 1,4-Dioxane | 123-91-1 | Cancer | 1988 |
| 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) | 149-30-4 | Cancer | 2017 |
| 4,4′-Methylenedianiline (MDA) | 101-77-9 | Cancer | 1988 |
| 4-Aminobiphenyl | 92-67-1 | Cancer | 1987 |
| Acetaldehyde | 75-07-0 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Aldrin | 309-00-2 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Aniline | 62-53-3 | Cancer | 1990 |
| Anthracene | 120-12-7 | Cancer | 2023 |
| Antimony trioxide | 1309-64-4 | Cancer | 1990 |
| Asbestos (chrysotile/amphibole) | 1332-21-4 | Cancer | 1987 |
| Benz[a]anthracene | 56-55-3 | Cancer | 1987 |
| Benzidine | 92-87-5 | Cancer | 1987 |
| Benzo[a]pyrene | 50-32-8 | Cancer | 1987 |
| Bis(chloromethyl) ether | 542-88-1 | Cancer | 1987 |
| Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) | 25013-16-5 | Cancer | 1990 |
| Carbon black | 1333-86-4 | Cancer | 2003 |
| Carbon tetrachloride | 56-23-5 | Cancer | 1987 |
| Chlordane | 57-74-9 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Chrysene | 218-01-9 | Cancer | 1990 |
| Cisplatin | 15663-27-1 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Cobalt | 7440-48-4 | Cancer | 1992 |
| Dibenz[a,h]anthracene | 53-70-3 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Dieldrin | 60-57-1 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Diisononyl phthalate | 28553-12-0 | Cancer | 2013 |
| Dimethylformamide (DMF) | 68-12-2 | Cancer | 2017 |
| Disperse Blue 1 | 2475-45-8 | Cancer | 1990 |
| Ethylbenzene | 100-41-4 | Cancer | 2004 |
| Formaldehyde | 50-00-0 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Glyphosate | 1071-83-6 | Cancer | 2017 |
| Hexachlorobutadiene | 87-68-3 | Cancer | 2011 |
| Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene | 193-39-5 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Methylene chloride (dichloromethane) | 75-09-2 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Mirex (dodecachloropentacyclodecane) | 2385-85-5 | Cancer | 1988 |
| N-Nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) | 1116-54-7 | Cancer | 1988 |
| N-Nitrosodimethylamine | 62-75-9 | Cancer | 1987 |
| N-Nitrosonornicotine | 16543-55-8 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Naphthalene | 91-20-3 | Cancer | 2002 |
| Nickel | 7440-02-0 | Cancer | 1989 |
| Nicotine-derived nitrosamine ketone | 64091-91-4 | Cancer | 1990 |
| o-Toluidine | 95-53-4 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Pentachlorophenol | 87-86-5 | Cancer | 1990 |
| Perchloroethylene (PERC) | 127-18-4 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Propoxur (Baygon) | 114-26-1 | Cancer | 2006 |
| Propylene oxide | 75-56-9 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Styrene | 100-42-5 | Cancer | 2016 |
| TDCPP (chlorinated tris) | 13674-87-8 | Cancer | 2011 |
| Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) | 79-94-7 | Cancer | 2017 |
| Toluene diisocyanate | 584-84-9 | Cancer | 1989 |
| Toxaphene | 8001-35-2 | Cancer | 1988 |
| Tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) | 115-96-8 | Cancer | 1992 |
| Vinyl chloride | 75-01-4 | Cancer | 1987 |
| 2-Methoxyethanol | 109-86-4 | Reproductive | 1989 |
| 5-Fluorouracil | 51-21-8 | Reproductive | 1989 |
| Atrazine | 1912-24-9 | Reproductive | 2016 |
| Benzyl butyl phthalate | 85-68-7 | Reproductive | 2005 |
| Bisphenol A | 80-05-7 | Reproductive | 2015 |
| Bisphenol S | 80-09-1 | Reproductive | 2023 |
| Carbon monoxide | 630-08-0 | Reproductive | 1989 |
| Carboplatin | 41575-94-4 | Reproductive | 1990 |
| Chloromethane (methyl chloride) | 74-87-3 | Reproductive | 2000 |
| Chlorpyrifos | 2921-88-2 | Reproductive | 2017 |
| Dibutyl phthalate | 84-74-2 | Reproductive | 2005 |
| Endrin | 72-20-8 | Reproductive | 1998 |
| Ifosfamide | 3778-73-2 | Reproductive | 1990 |
| Mercury | 7439-97-6 | Reproductive | 1990 |
| n-Hexane | 110-54-3 | Reproductive | 2017 |
| Nicotine | 54-11-5 | Reproductive | 1990 |
| Perfluorooctane sulfonate | 1763-23-1 | Reproductive | 2017 |
| Toluene | 108-88-3 | Reproductive | 1991 |
Compiled by matching each atlas compound's CAS number, then name, against the OEHHA Proposition 65 list (December 2025 version). Delisted chemicals are excluded. Metals that California lists as a family, such as lead and arsenic, are shown with the endpoints from their combined listings. Regulatory — OEHHA
What the list does not tell you
This is the part that keeps the table honest, and it is the reason we publish the caveats as prominently as the count.
A listing does not mean the chemical is present in your mattress. It means the chemical is capable of causing harm and has been formally identified. Whether it is in your bedroom, at what concentration, and whether it reaches you, are separate questions. That is what the individual atlas pages are for, and it is why we tag every claim with an evidence tier rather than treating "listed" as the end of the story.
A listing also does not mean your exposure is unsafe. California triggers a warning above a "safe harbor" level, and those levels are set to be protective, not realistic-worst-case. For a carcinogen the No Significant Risk Level is the dose expected to cause no more than one additional cancer in 100,000 people exposed every day for 70 years. Regulatory — OEHHA NSRL/MADL A label tells you the exposure crossed that cautious line somewhere, not that it is high.
And the reverse trap is just as real: a compound being absent from the list does not make it safe. Prop 65 is a California program with its own criteria and its own backlog. Plenty of chemicals worth understanding are not on it, and being un-listed is not a clean bill of health. The 2018 coffee episode, where naturally occurring acrylamide in a brewed cup triggered cancer warnings until the state stepped in to clarify coffee, is the standing reminder that the presence or absence of a warning is a legal signal, not a risk measurement.
How to use it without scaring yourself
The list is most useful as an index, not a verdict. If a compound shows up in your bedroom and it is on this table, that is a reason to read its atlas page and understand the real exposure route, not a reason to panic about a sticker. If it is not on the table, that is not permission to stop thinking. The value of joining the two is that it turns a wall of identical warning labels back into 89 specific, named chemicals you can actually look up.
We will keep this in sync as California revises the list and as the atlas grows. For the chemistry behind any single entry, start with the Bedroom Chemistry Atlas; for how a chemical earns its way onto a regulatory list in the first place, the Regulatory Tracker follows the active proceedings.
Embr is an independent, evidence-tiered guide to the chemistry of the home. We have no affiliate relationships and no financial stake in what you buy. This piece reports a regulatory fact and links to primary sources so you can check it yourself.
Frequently asked questions
What does a Prop 65 warning actually mean?+
It means the product can expose you to a chemical California has identified as causing cancer or reproductive harm. The warning is a hazard notice, not a measurement of your personal risk. Chemicals reach the list when a body like IARC, the National Toxicology Program, or the US EPA classifies them, when California's experts list them, or when federal law already requires a label. It tells you the chemical is present above a conservative threshold, not that the dose is dangerous for you.
Does a listing mean the chemical is dangerous at my exposure level?+
Not by itself. A listing is hazard identification: the chemical can cause harm at some dose. Whether your exposure matters depends on how much reaches you and for how long, which the list does not address. California's safe-harbor warning levels are deliberately cautious (the No Significant Risk Level is the dose expected to cause no more than one extra cancer per 100,000 over a lifetime). A warning flags a real hazard worth understanding, but it is the start of an exposure question, not the answer.
How many chemicals are on the Proposition 65 list?+
About 900 chemicals are currently listed, and California revises the list at least once a year. It covers industrial chemicals, pesticides, metals, combustion byproducts, some drugs, and natural substances. Of the 261 compounds in Embr's Bedroom Chemistry Atlas, 89 (34%) appear on it.
Is formaldehyde on the Prop 65 list?+
Yes. Formaldehyde has been listed as a carcinogen since 1988. It is relevant to the bedroom because it off-gasses from some pressed-wood furniture, adhesives, and textile finishes. Being listed does not tell you the concentration in any specific product; it tells you the hazard is established. The formaldehyde atlas page covers where it shows up and at what evidence tier.
Why does everything in California seem to carry a warning?+
Because the law puts the burden on businesses, the safe-harbor thresholds are low, and under-warning is riskier than over-warning. Many companies label broadly to avoid liability even when exposure is minimal. The 2018 acrylamide-in-coffee episode is the classic case: brewed coffee naturally contains a listed chemical, which triggered warnings until the state acted to clarify coffee. The result is warning fatigue. That is why matching the list to a curated, evidence-tiered atlas is more useful than reading one sticker.
- California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). The Proposition 65 List (December 2025 version). oehha.ca.gov Regulatory
- OEHHA. Proposition 65 in Plain Language. oehha.ca.gov Regulatory
- OEHHA. No Significant Risk Levels (NSRLs) and Maximum Allowable Dose Levels (MADLs). oehha.ca.gov Regulatory
- California OEHHA. Proposition 65 Warnings Website. p65warnings.ca.gov Regulatory
Discussion